– What’s up, guys? Saf now on SuperSaf TV. And welcome to anotherSuperSafStyle camera comparison. This is the one everybodyhas is awaiting. It is the iPhone 12 Pro Max versus the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. As always, we’ll be testingout all aspects of the cameras, epitomes, video, low-pitched beacon, portraits. I’ll be leaving sometimestamps down below, so if there is a particular section that you’re interested in, you can check that out.But don’t skip, this is goingto be an interesting video. Front-facing cameras, we’regoing to test out stabilization. So, currently, a general path. And let’s go ahead and extend. Now, we are currently in 4K 60 fps. We’re going to see if thismakes much of certain differences to dynamic series stabilization. So, let’s go. And now we’ve switched overto the rear-facing cameras. And both designs do have anultra wide camera as well, so we can switch to this.And we’re getting batches more into our shot. And they both too have a zoom camera. We have 2.5 on the iPhone, and we have 5x visual zoom on the Note. We’ll exam out stabilizationwith the primary cameras. So, precisely strolling and now let’s run. But we’re also going totest out stabilization with the ultra wide cameras.Again, a move , now into a stream. Now, we are at 4K 60 fps on both maneuvers. And we’re going to testout stabilization at 4K 60. Walking and let’s run. Now, we’re just going todo a low-pitched light-footed video research. You can probably hear some fireworks. And we’ll take a walkas well in low-pitched light-headed. Lots of overcast. Spooky, creepy light tonight. Now, both devices do have4k HDR video recording. So, we’re going to testthis out with a great deal of glowing coming in here from the background. So, it should make us agood theory of dynamic reach. We are exporting this video out standard dynamic array sothat method everybody can see it, irrespective of the displaythat you’re watching here.But regardles, let me knowwhat you guys see. The iPhone also has 4K HDRfrom the front-facing cameras. This is something that youdon’t have on the Note 20 Ultra, so we’re just going to test this out. And we will be exportingthis out once again, standard dynamic rangeso everybody can see it. But a lot of light-headed comingin here from the background. Let me know what you guys envision. Now, the Note 20 Ultra does let you film at up to 8K which is pretty insane. It does pasture in quitea bit, as “youre seeing”, to achieve the 8K andstabilization is not really there when you’re filming at 8K. However, the option is there, and you can get a lot of detail. Now, to test the autofocuson the iPhone 12 Pro Max. Very, very fast. Same test on the Note 20 Ultra, also fast. Low light autofocus teston the iPhone 12 Pro Max. And still seems to be doing really well, thanks to that LiDAR sensor. Now, on the Note 20 Ultra, it does seem to bestruggling a little bit. Yeah. So, that was the video.Now, before we move onto portraits, if you like what you’re seeing still further, then do consider agreeing. It will want a lot tome and it’ll too mean that you’ll get to seeall of the latest content now on the channel, SuperSafStyle, first. Let’s have a look at whatwe’re working with now. So, for the front-facing cameras, the iPhone does have aslightly higher resolution. And for the rear-facing cameras, we have a similar setup. We have an ultra widecamera, a primary camera, as well as a zoom camera. The ultra wide camera, 12 megapixels on both. The primary camera, we actuallyhave a 108 megapixel sensor on the Note 20 Ultra. However, I’ve mentioned thismany times in previous videos, the Note 20 Ultra shoots bestimages at around 12 megapixels and that’s where you’ll get the best computational photography. It established at 12 megapixelsat default as well. And that is the resolution wewill be using for these tests. Ultimately, for the zoom cameras, the iPhone has a 2.5 x zoom. The Note 20 Ultra actuallyuses periscope zoom technology and it can give you up to 5x optical zoom.There’s a LiDAR scanner on the iPhone. And there’s a laser autofocussensor on the Note 20 Ultra. Right, with all of thatsaid, let’s got to get it. Now, in good brightnes, honestly speaking, I don’t think you can gowrong with either of these. You get further details, lots of dynamic array, and really nice pigments. The hues do differ slightlyand this is something we’ve seen time and time again. I would say that Samsungdevices do tend to lean towards more of a colourful saturated surface, which a lot of people do like. The iPhone generallyhas more natural colors, and this is something that we can see quite well in this example. The foliages on the iPhone, definitely more what I wasseeing with my own looks. The Note 20 Ultra time opening those foliages a bit more of a pierce, whichagain, a great deal of parties do like, so it is going to come downto personal preference.One thing I do want to pointout here is the depth of battleground. So, if you look at theleaves in the background, they are more bled on the Note 20 Ultra, and that is because ithas a larger sensor. So, you can sometimes get a really nice shallow depth of fieldeffect on the Note 20 Ultra straight from the camera itself. However, this can sometimes be a little bit at a disadvantage and that is because you havea very small area of focus. So, here on this lesson of this bud, got to get love autumn, right? It’s autumn , not fall, by the way. Anyway, if you look at thisleaf, towards the edges, you can see that the Note 20 Ultra is already starting to blur the leading edge out. And that is once again because of that very small area of focus. So, just something to bear in mind. Now, I actually wanted to testout dynamic straddle so far, so I went to some terribly tricky situations, where we had a lot of sunlight coming in from the background.And frankly speaking, bothdo a very, very good job. However, they do handlethings slightly differently. And this is something that Ithink you’ll notice throughout. The Note 20 Ultra doesn’t mind clipping a few of the highlights really to give you some brighter shadows, as you can see in this example here if you look towards the sun. More of the highlights have been clipped on the Note versus the iPhone. However, the Note isbrighter in the shadow neighborhoods. And here is another extreme example. So, if you look towards the sun, the Note has blown thatout a little bit more.But the dark ranges arebrighter on the Note. And this really I did notice, the iPhone tends to try to go for something a bit more balanced, and it tries not to cliptoo many highlightings. But this means that theshadows are not as shining. So, honestly speaking again, it’s going to come downto personal predilection. I speculate both sets of do a great job in good light-headed from the primary cameras. What about the ultra wide cameras? I’m somebody who loves taking shots with the ultra wide cameras, and both of these havegreat ultra wide cameras. You can see some examples here. Again, the differences in the greens. But generally speaking, both are very, very good. Here, the iPhone does seem tobe brighter in the darks. But in this example here, the Note once again, as we examine earlier on, it is clipping the highlights towards where the daylight “ve come”, but it’s handing us much brighter palls. The iPhone is not clipping as numerous highlights towards the sun, but the darkness are a little bit darker.Again, I think it’s going tocome down to personal advantage. Nonetheless, in these shots, Ido prefer the Note 20 Ultra. So, the iPhone, because of the dawn coming in from the background, it has contended a little, and the darks are quite dark. Whereas the Note 20 Ultra, even though it hasn’t really clipped too many highlightings in comparison, it is giving us a muchmore delighting image, and the dark details are brighter. Here’s another example. Again, we’re shooting inthe shade of the tree, and going straight up. And now, the iPhone has moved for a little more of asilhouette, I would say. Whereas the Note 20 Ultra hasbrightened up those shadows. And I really like the imagehere from the Note 20 Ultra. Now, what about the zoom? Well, here’s a shot fromthe primary cameras.Absolutely penalize, this is at 1x. Now, if we go 2.5 x, whichis the native visual zoom on the iPhone 12 Pro Max, then we do get a cleaner pictureon the iPhone 12 Pro Max. And that is because youonly have digital zoom at around 2, 2.5 x. The visual zoom does notkick until you go to 5x. Now, it might not be so clearhere but if we do go in 200%, you can see that the text ismuch clearer on the iPhone. And that is thanks tothat visual zoom at 2.5 x. However, as soon as you goto 5x zoom, then clearly, the Note 20 Ultra gets the win because then you are at digital zoom on the iPhone 12 Pro Max. Items are sharper. You can see a lot more of the textbook now. And you can go furtherwith the Note 20 Ultra.The iPhone tells you go ata max of 12 x digital zoom. However, you’re not goingto come immense results at this because you are goingfrom 2.5 x visual zoom all the way to 12. Whereas on the Note, you’re going from 5x optical zoom to 10, 12 x. And here, the verse is much clearer, and you can really experience certain advantages that you get with a periscope zoom camera. You can go even further, 20 x. And now you are eligible to exactly predict everything that it says on this indicate. And “if youre going to”, you can go all the wayup to 50 x digital zoom. And although it is usefulin certain situations, I symbolize, if you do havea sign in the distance which you want to see, thenyes, the 50 x zoom may help here.It’s something that Idon’t really use too often because I think there isvery specific situations where you can use that 50 x zoom. Nevertheless, when it comesto zoom, anything above 5x, the Note clearly gettingthe advantage here. Now, what about biographies? We all desire sketches, the blurry backgrounds. Well, both devices canshoot photographs at 1x, as well as 2x on the Noteand 2.5 x on the iPhone.And let’s take a lookat a few specimen here. So, this is using the primary camera. I belief both are doingan overall immense job. You can see that peripheries are not perfect. The piping in the background, both the machines have missed it when it’s kind of reached my face, so they’ve got a little bit confused. But nevertheless, both aretaking excellent shots here. I’ve said this many times before, and I know I’m going to get somehate for it in specific comments, but I do prefer surface colors on the iPhone compared to the Note, which does give you fairly paleskin sounds, in my opinion.And especially for somebodylike me who’s got chocolate-brown scalp, I do find that the Notedoes try to brighten me up, shall “theyre saying”? Now, what about if we make photographs at the zoomed in alternative, right? So, it’s 2x on the Noteand it’s 2.5 on the iPhone. And here, for me, it’s aneasy, easy picking for the iPhone. This gives people approximately the equivalent of a 65 millimeter lens on a pro camera. The Note is going foraround a 50 millimeter lens. And both actually, good direction of look. The question is, the Note does not have a dedicated camera at 2 or 2.5 x. It is using the primary cameraand then it’s punching in. And that does to be translated into a softer shot compared to the iPhone 12 Pro Max. Again, the Note hasbrightened me up a little bit.And if we do look at advantages, although both are doinga good job overall, the iPhone is doing better. Check out that pipe again. That had been bled on the iPhone, whereas that has beenmissed out on the Note. Here’s another description shot. And I suppose both are actually doing really good in terms of rims. I can’t really read any flaws now. The Note, once again , notas sharp as the iPhone. Now, I certainly wantedto assessment out on extreme when it is necessary to portraits is how they direct dynamic collection when we are using the portraitmode because there’s a lot of computational photographyhappening in the background. And now, we’ve got a lot oflight coming from the side. And the iPhone, although it’s not excellent, and it has clipped somehighlights on my face, I do think it’s doingan overall better job.Whereas almost half my face has been various kinds of blownout on the Note 20 Ultra. If we do use the zoom on both sets of, again, you can see that althoughthe iPhone is not perfect, and it has stimulated me quitea bit orange, actually, it hasn’t clipped as manyhighlights as the Note has. And the Note has actually mademe look extremely, highly yellowish. So, I am liking portraitsbetter on the iPhone so far. And what about low-toned light sketches? So, thanks to the LiDARscanner now on the iPhone, we can get really nice lowlight paintings as well. So, here is a portrait from the primary cameras on both inventions. And the iPhone, it’s asharper epitome, it’s cleaner, and it’s also get better colourings. My skin is completelywashed out on the Note. I’m looking very ghostly here. Now, here’s the thing. The iPhone can doportraits with nighttime procedure, but that is only with the 1x camera.As soon as you use the telephoto camera, then you can see theresult is much darker. And it is sharper compared to the Note, but the memorandum is brighter. Now, recollect, that is because the Note is using the primarycamera and cropping in. So, it’s not as sharp-worded butbecause it’s the primary camera, it is brighter. Another likenes in low-pitched light-footed and again, I am liking the iPhone now a lot more. It’s just a brighter idol. It’s sharper. The colorings are better. Now, now, where reference is do goin with the zoom cameras, then the iPhone sounds even darker. And again, that is because it’susing the telephoto camera. The Note is cultivating into the primary camera. So again, it’s softer, but it is brighter compared to the iPhone. Now, simply to kind of test this out, what I did is I got theprimary camera image, and then I actually just expanded it because that’s essentiallywhat the Note is doing. And here, you can seethat the image is soft, as the Note image is softbut it is much brighter.So, that is just somethingthat I did want to touch on. I please Apple did have the night mode with the telephoto camera for biographies because although they wouldn’t be as good as the primary camera, at least they wouldgive you better arises. Now, let’s move on to low-toned sun likeness. And frankly speaking, I thinkboth do a really good job. There are slight differences in color. The Note tends to leantowards cool styles, whereas the iPhone tends tolean towards warmer manner. On this precedent, Iactually really like both. I truly can’t pick a champion between them. I meditate both are doing areally, really good job. Now is another image. And now, although both are doing good, I do prefer the Note 20 Ultra. It really does appear a tad sharper. On the iPhone, when you areshooting into street lights, it can give you a lot of these dots. So, I do prefer the Note 20 Ultra now. However, in this shotI do opt the iPhone. The iPhone is a little bit sharper and it also has lessnoise in the vapour arenas. What about in indoor low-toned sunlight shots? I envision both are doing great here.Once again, cool on theNote, warmer on the iPhone. I envision when it comes tolow light photography, both are really, really goodfrom the primary cameras. But what about the ultra wide cameras? Well, on the ultra wide cameras, we do have night modeon the iPhone this year. Last-place time, we did not. And here, I review neitherof these are great. They’re not that abrupt, so I would call this one a bit of a outline. Nonetheless, on this shot, I doprefer the Note 20 Ultra. It is just an overallsharper and clean persona. Now, let me explain. It might not be so obvious when we are looking atthese at a 4K resolving. If we zoom in 200%, look at the sharpen that’shappening on the iPhone. So, the iPhone is trying tocompensate for the softness in lower light-colored for the ultra wide camera with application sharpening. And that is very, very obvious here in the tree areas, as well as the vapours. And I’m definitely not a fan of that, so here, I do think that theNote 20 Ultra is doing better. And here’s another shot. And again, I do preferthe Note 20 Ultra here.It’s just a clean idol overall, and it’s also brighter and sharper. So, when it does come tothe ultra wide camera, I am liking the Note2 0 Ultra in low-spirited light-footed. Now, what about selfies, good old selfies? Both actually do a really good job here. You can see, we’ve got lotsof detail, very sharp personas. Divergences in scalp ambiance is again. Both smartphones can alsoget a wider field of view from the front-facing camera. So, if you do want to getmore beings into your shots, you’ll be able to do that. And the iPhone is a little bit wider compared to the Note 20 Ultra. This really I “ve noticed”. Now, what about dynamic array? So, I did go into a few trickydynamic stray situations.And I did opt the iPhone overall because it actually favors the subject when it comes to exposure. And it has clipped a fewhighlights in the clouds. So, if you look towards the background, it has clipped a few foregrounds. Nonetheless, it is giving you amore overall satisfy shot compared to the Note. Now, I wanted to test this out even more. So, here on this shot, the iPhone hasn’t really clipped manyhighlights in the background. It seems about the same aswhat we’ve got on the Note. But the foreground is much, much brighter, and you’ve got a much more usable selfie, in my opinion, on the iPhonecompared to the Note 20 Ultra.However, when it is necessary to portraits from the front-facing camera, the Note does get an advantage. So, here is a standard shottaken from both inventions. And I review both are actuallydoing a really good job when it is necessary to edges. I actually can’t notice anyfaults on either of them. Happy with both sets of. The report contains those differences in skin tone. The Note 20 Ultra doeshave the wider option for paintings as well. This is something that youdon’t get on the iPhone. As soon as you activate portrait mode from the selfie camera, it exactly ties the angle.It doesn’t let you get thatwider angle of view anymore. So, that is an advantage thatyou get here on the Note, which again is doing a reallygood job in terms of perimeters, but it does give you that opennes. Now, what about low-pitched light-footed selfies, right? So, here is a selfie takenin low-toned light on both. Neither are doing good. The Note is cleaner, but Iam looking very ghostly here, like fully bleached out. The iPhone, although it hastried to maintain some coloring, it’s a very, unusually boisterous image.So, personally speaking, Idon’t like either of these. Now, both machines do have a night mode from the front-facing camera here as well. And they’re doing much, much better. The iPhone does seem to bebrighter, but it’s not as sharp. I do like the complexions better on the iPhone, but the Note does have a cleaner image. And there is again, thatprocessing happens on the iPhone, like we heard on the ultra wide camera. Look towards my top, look towards the sky. You can be found in the artificial sharpen there in the background.And both machines do havea front-facing flash. And now, I like the colorsbetter on the iPhone. Very washed out on the Note 20 Ultra. Although, it is giving youan overall brighter persona, I think it’s a little bit too much. I do prefer the emblazons on the iPhone. Right, that was a lot to cover. What are my judgments? Well, candidly speaking, I study both of these smartphoneshave excellent cameras. Some of the best out there. Let’s break down all thedifferent categories. So, when it comes to video, I conclude both are really good. The iPhone does have betteroverall dynamic array. When it comes to stabilization, I contemplate both are actually very good, and I couldn’t reallypick one or the other.However, the iPhone doestend to flicker a little bit when there is a situationwhere you’ve kind of got the sun in the background on the floor. So, when I was rolling, therewas a little bit of a flicker. So, that is what I noticed. Now, I know not everybody’s going to be out there running withtheir smartphones like I do, but just something to mention there. Now, for HDR, HDR is such a headache. But I discussed this in a lot of detail in my previous camera similarity, which I will join in thecause and in the description.But in a nutshell, bothdevices can film HDR. However, HDR video simply looksgood on compatible showings. Unfortunately, this isvery difficult for me to show in a camera comparison that’s going to be viewedby hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people onthousands of different devices. So, what I did do is I give the smartphones do the processing themselvesto alter them to SDR, which for example, if you were to upload to social media or something, then most people will be view those as. And in my experience, theiPhone merely did a lot better. And that includes lookingat the HDR footage on the smartphone screens themselves. Having a look at both, I did favor the iPhone’s dynamic compas. HDR is really, really good on the iPhone. And it also does a really good job of exporting that HDR video to a format that’s viewable by everybody. So, HDR video, I would haveto give the iPhone the edge. Now, the Note 20 Ultradoes get a few advantages.It does have 8K video, something that is notavailable on the iPhone. And it also has a pro video mode built in, so if you do want to nip some names, and actually get the look that you’re after, you’ll be able to do that with the Note straight out of the box. The iPhone, you will haveto get a third-party app, something like FiLMiC Pro. Now, what about autofocus? Well, in good sunlight, itwas pretty much a describe. However, in low-toned light, theiPhone was just much better. That is because of that LiDAR scanner. Now, the Note 20 Ultra does have that laser autofocus sensor.However, this doesn’t really seem to help too much in low-grade light, autofocus. And also, low-grade dawn video, going to be home and have a look. The iPhone just gave youcleaner video in low-pitched light-footed. There wasn’t as much sound. And especially when wewere moving, on the Note, you could really receive some jitters there, whereas these were notthere on the iPhone. Likewise, when it is necessary to 4K 60 fps, the Note 20 Ultra can only do 4K 60 from the primary camera on the back.The iPhone can do 4K 60 fps across all three of therear-facing cameras. And for vlogging, expending thefront-facing cameras for video, the iPhone, better dynamic reach overall. Stabilization, I wouldsay was very similar. I had to watch it a few ages, but you can go back and have a look. However, when you do get to 60 fps from the front-facing cameras, the iPhone, you don’t get that HDR anymore, so the dynamics rangedoes lose quite a bit. And if you ogle especially towards my face when I was loping, thenthings were overexposed. When it comes to slowmotion, the Note 20 Ultra, you can do super slow mo which is 960 fps. However, on the iPhone, you can do slow motion, once again from all of the cameras. On the Note 20 Ultra, it islimited to the primary camera. So, overall for video, theiPhone would be my select. And I still do think that whenit comes to a video packet on a smartphone, the iPhoneis still the best choice. Now, for idols, in good flame, you can’t go wrong with either of these.They go excellent shots. Slight differences in color as we’ve seen. It’s going to come downto personal wish. Slight differences in the way they treat dynamic straddle as well. But nevertheless, I thinkboth are absolutely great. I’m going to call thatone a little of a derive. For zoom, the iPhone will giveyou better reactions at 2.5 x, but anything above 5x, the Note 20 Ultra will giveyou better makes, hands down. For photographs, it’s an easy one for me. I remember the iPhone doesdo a better overall occupation. Better shades and too better likeness at in various regions of the 65 millimeter focal span, thanks to that dedicatedoptical zoom camera at that focal length. The Note 20 Ultra does have to crop in to give you that tilt andresults in softer images.And also, low-grade sunrise likeness, the iPhone, thanks to that LiDAR scanner, does give you betteroverall low flame paintings. Now, what about the ultra wide cameras? Well, I review both actually did a really, really good job in good illuminate. Dynamic range, once again, is handled differently by both of these devices. If I was to pick an ultrawide camera between these two, I would lean towards the Note 20 Ultra because I do think it gives you an overall more pleasant glance andespecially low-grade light.I envisage the Note 20 Ultradoes a much better job for the ultra wide camera in low-spirited light-headed. Now, for the primary camera in low-toned light-headed, frankly speaking, it was a bit of a evoke. It did go back and forth, but I remember both do really, really well in low-pitched glowing with their respective nighttime modes. And for selfies, I know a good deal of it comes down to personal advantage. I recall the iPhone does give you overall better dynamic array. The Note 20 Ultra, however, does give you that wider field of view for biographies. And audio, well, I’ll let yougo back and have a listen.To my ears, both actuallysounded really, really gone. That’s what I believe anyway. What do you guys conceive? Do drop me a comment below, and let me you know your thoughts. And if you want to see a lot of likeness made on lots of different manoeuvres, then do gives people a follow on Instagram. I’m @SuperSaf and I postvery regularly on there. I hope you experienced thisvideo and learnt it is helpful. If you did, a thumbs upwould be appreciated. And it would make my day if you subscribe to the channel as well. These camera comparisonstake forever to put together. But we’re going to have morecoming here, SuperSafStyle. So, if you’re subscribed andyou’ve hit that bell icon, then you won’t miss them.Thanks for watching, thisis Saf on SuperSaf TV. And I’ll see you next time.( soft upbeat music ).
iPhone 12 Pro MAX vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra Camera Test Comparison
